Traditional Energy Resources
In order to generate the energy needed by the world, power stations usually use traditional energy sources, such as fossil fuels or uranium. Although nuclear power allows the production of a great amount of energy with small amounts of uranium, most power stations prefer burning coal, oil or natural gas because of how dangerous the wastes of nuclear power may be. The following paragraphs will talk about fossil fuels and nuclear power in general, explaining their advantages and disadvantages.
Fossil Fuels
//
Fossil fuels are hydrocarbons, above all coal, fuel oil or natural gas, which were formed from the remains of dead plants and animals. These energy resources provide a great amount of the whole electrical power the world uses and are used especially for activities such as heating, transport and electricity generation.
The procedure through which this electrical power is achieved with the use of coal, oil and gas is the following:

(source: http://home.clara.net/darvill/altenerg/fossil.htm)
http://www.carsdirect.com/encyclopedia/fossil-fuels-coal-oil-and-natural-gas
The advantages of these energy resources are that a lot of energy can be generated using cheap materials and that the power stations in which these resources are handled can be built almost anywhere. However, this generation of energy produces many negative effects as well. When you burn fuel you produce dangerous substances, such as carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide. These gases cause pollution and contribute to dangerous processes for the earth, such as the greenhouse effect and acid rain. Moreover, this kind of energy resource is not a renewable resource.
Nuclear Energy: an alternative energy source?
The production of nuclear energy was abandoned in Italy after the referendum of 1987, in which the 80% of the votes showed the citizens' will to stop creating this kind of energy. Nuclear explosions produce radiations, which harm the cells of human body and make people sick or even kill them. Illnesses can strike people years after their exposure to nuclear radiation. This type of energy causes serious risks to the environment, such as the disastrous accident that happened in 1986 in Chernobyl, Russia. The leak of a large amount of radition provoked the death of thousands of people and the population is still paying the consequences of that painful event. The citizens of all Europe were exposed to the risk of diseases since the explotion of a nuclear bomb can expads throughout miles and miles away.

Photo source http://users.owt.com/smsrpm/Chernobyl/glbrad.html
Moreover, nuclear reactors have waste disposal problems. Reactors produce nuclear waste products which emit dangerous radiations. Because they could kill people who touch them, they cannot be thrown away like ordinary garbage. Currently, many nuclear wastes are stored in special cooling pools at the nuclear reactors.
However, as the earth has limited quantities of coal and oil, nuclear plants still play a central role in providing energy and Italy is bound to buy it from France, Germany and
Russia. In case of explotion we will pay the consequences (see picture) of the radiation as well. Nuclear power plants need less fuel than the ones which burn fossil fuels (1 ton of uranium produces more energy than several tons of coal). Moreover, well-operated nuclear plants do not release in the air toxic substances.
Comments (8)
Lucrezia Bissaro said
at 6:13 pm on Mar 27, 2007
Dear Isabella, I 've just started writing and cleaning our part. I added some information on the section " nuclear energy" could you please have a look and tell me how to improve it? I didn't start restructure all the rest because I didn't know how you wanted to do. let me know your ideas, in meanwhile I search for grammar mistakes. See you sooner
Lucrezia
lucreziabis said
at 11:31 am on Mar 28, 2007
Dear Isabella, I tried to correct some mistakes and to reformulate sentences. If you don't like, don't worry, simply cancell my part. I added some information about nuclear energy and correct the part about Referendum ( IN fact most of referendum are " abrogativi" so the citizens were in favour, not against) Pleas have a look and let me know.
Isabella Perini said
at 4:36 pm on Mar 28, 2007
Hi Lucrezia! Sorry if I haven't aswered to you yet but I just read your comments. I'll have a look at our part now and tell you what I think!
Isabella Perini said
at 6:28 pm on Mar 28, 2007
Dear Lucrezia,
I looked at our part and edited some of the things I had written. Then I read your part as well and reformulated your sentence on the referendum..take a look at how I did it..if it doesn't express what you wanted to say originally than change it back..no problem for me! Let me know!
Ah, don't you think we should take away the part on the energy end renewable resources? Because I think it's someone else's part!
bye!!!!
Isabella Perini said
at 7:48 pm on Mar 28, 2007
I was looking at the other parts..and I saw that the paragragh 'main energy resources in Italy' (is it yours?) is already in another section.. the one about Italy.
lucreziabis said
at 4:46 pm on Mar 29, 2007
Dear Isabella, I didn't write this part, so maybe I was confused when I copied it from the energy page."main energy resources" and even renewable resources are not mine, we can cut them off. Sorry I made a little mess, now I'll read your change and delete the parts we don't need! See you sooner
lucreziabis said
at 4:57 pm on Mar 29, 2007
Isalla, I 've just try to edit the page in order to get rid of the wrong paragraphs but unfortunately I cannot. Could you please delete the wrong paragraph and edit our part in the main page. I agree with all your change and I think you enriched my corrections in the proper way. Thank you very much
Isabella Perini said
at 5:13 pm on Mar 30, 2007
Ok, I'll try to do it now!
You don't have permission to comment on this page.